“Again,” referencing an earlier post I made about social efforts by churches.
Today’s is from the National Council of Churches’ letter to President Obama, urging him to cut poverty in half–
There is no greater concern among the churches of Christ than for those in this nation who live in poverty. This could hardly be otherwise because Jesus himself lived among the poor: loving them, eating and drinking with them, healing them, and speaking words of justice and assurance that God’s own love for the poor is unsurpassed.
Really? No greater concern?
I suppose this does become a church’s greatest concern when they deny the gospel and a host of doctrines fundamental to Christianity. But I’ve addressed this week already too.
Once in awhile we’ll take our Wednesday Bible study for an “Ask the Pastor” session. It’s usually a lot of fun, in addition to being helpful. Occasionally someone will ask a real tough question that I have to answer with “Uh, I have no idea. I’ll have to get back to you on that one.”
In a jail in Philippi, there were two men who were asked a great question:
Sirs, what must I do to be saved?
An answer was readily and confidently given:
Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.
Let’s pray that that great question is asked more often, and we’ll have the opportunity to give the great answer!
What role should the Christian church have in helping the poor and downtrodden?
This pastor says that it is a “biblical mandate” to spend our lives helping the poor, regardless of their response, for these reasons:
- The OT clearly expects it, Deut 15:7-8
- “The sin of Sodom was their lack of concern for the unrighteous poor, and the result of this sin was God’s judgment on both the rich and poor alike”, Ezek 16:49
- Jesus expects His followers to serve “even the least of these,” Matt 25:40
- Doing so is the best way of reminding yourself of the gospel
Thus, helping the unrighteous poor is something that should be done for its own sake, not even with the pretext of establishing a “bridge” for evangelism. This is what many evangelical churches, schools, leaders, books, websites, and radio stations hold to and promote.
However, I believe that there is no “social mandate” as described above, for the following reasons:
- Social action for “pre-evangelism” is unbiblical for it ignores the depravity of the human heart and denigrates the power of the gospel
- Appeals to the OT for explicit commands to social action ignore the dispensational differences between Israel, the Church, and the Kingdom of God
- The Bible never commands the church to be involved in social issues
- The Bible only commands the church to be involved in “social action” toward fellow believers
Go to Mark Perry’s article here for more detailed discussion on this matter.
This is yet one more reason why ministry fellowship with “conservative evangelicals” should not be pursued. I’m not calling their salvation, commitment to moral purity, devotion to missions, or anything like that into question (so don’t start that, please). I am saying, “how can we have working fellowship with those with whom we have fundamental disagreements over essential beliefs of Christian life and ministry?”
Here’s a great post on how one neighbor man (who happened to be a pastor) was concerned for the souls of his Amish neighbors, and the varied responses his witness had.
What do you think about this statement?
God’s primary means of evangelism is for people to see the hope of Christ in our daily lives and to ask us about it.
This Doritos and Pepsi commercial scheduled to air during the Super Bowl is abominable:
As has been noted by many, if a similar commercial was made “just in good humor” with another religion in view–say, Islam–I doubt it would make it to the airwaves.
Christianity? Oh, that’s different. And those (such as myself) who shake their heads in disgust at it are told to “lighten up,” “have a sense of humor,” and etc.
The commercial mocks the Lord’s Supper, that ordinance which our Lord and Savior established to remember His substitutionary atoning sacrifice for our sin. And I should have a sense of humor about it?
Gay churches don’t have the built-in ability to attract families with children, teenagers with youth programs, and young people with church services like rock concerts. There are no “crying rooms” for babies at Joy MCC or Sunday-school classrooms or a day-care center during the week.
“What I’m finding is they don’t want to go to a church where they are segregated by their sexuality,” said the Rev. Jenn Stiles Williams, who has about 50 young gays in her contemporary service at St. Luke’s United Methodist Church in Orlando. “Their relationship with God is first, but they want a church where they can be who they are and not have to hide it.”
Anthony Larry, a 23-year-old gay black man, said he also tried Joy MCC before joining St. Luke’s United Methodist, where he found an outlet for his desire for community involvement — and a rocking contemporary church service. “This generation, we want to be able to serve God through serving people outside the church. But it’s also about dynamic worship. Retire the organ,” Larry said.
One way for Joy MCC to prosper is to address the need that young people, gay and straight, have to express their spirituality in ways far different from the traditional church service. It might be through interest groups or book clubs or services that start at 5 p.m. on Fridays or midnight spirituality-discussion sessions.
To sum up, church should be about “me,” and the only way for “me” centered-churches to continue their existence is to continually adapt to the changing whims of “me.”
Source: Orlando Sentiel
One should preach his beliefs, not his doubts.
–A. T. Robertson, The Glory of the Ministry, p. 62.
Notoriety always comes to the preacher who betrays his Lord or his gospel (60).
–A. T. Robertson, The Glory of the Ministry, p. 60.
(Commenting on 2 Cor 4:2) The temptation was often yielded to then as now, to put the best apples on top of the barrel, the best strawberries on top of the basket. The Judaizers made a plausible plea and show. Paul, in contrast, grounds his confidence on two reasons. One is his sincerity. His berries are as good at the bottom as at the top.
–A. T. Robertson, The Glory of the Ministry, p. 47.